Canon ET60 Lens Hood for EF 75-300mm f/4.0-5.6 SLR Lens
by Canon
|
List Price: Our Price: $24.30 You Save: $4.70 (16%) Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days Category: Digital Camera See more product details |
|---|
Customers in the UK,
Buy this product at amazon.co.uk
for British Pounds
Digital Cameras Photo Reviews of Canon ET60 Lens Hood for EF 75-300mm f/4.0-5.6 SLR Lens
Customer Review: Disappointed, not really Canon
Summary: 2 Stars
What I received was not "Canon" product as pictured, it was just stamped ET-60. Product quality lacking, was a hassle to try to fit to lens, even then it was not a good fit. Check with seller to be sure your getting a hood that is stamped "Canon ET-60 Japan", the couple dollars extra is worth it! It was "Utley" useless!Customer Review: Not Canon Brand
Summary: 1 Stars
Be careful ordering this item: the one I received was not a Canon brand lens hood. When I ordered mid-Jan 2011 the seller was listed as Joseph D Utley. If I had wanted an aftermarket product I would have ordered one for a third of the price of this one.
I contacted amazon customer sevice immediately and was told I could not exchange the item I received for a Canon brand item (as advertised) because it came from a third-party seller. So I returned it for a refund. I am very frustrated that the lens hood I received was not the Canon brand as advertised.
Customer Review: Doesn't Fit EF 75-300 Series I
Summary: 1 Stars
I also was unable to get this hood to fit my lense. I am using an older model EF 75-300 (not Series III or USM or IS). I called Canon tech support. They looked up the lense, apologized for the misprint on the Canon packaging, and said that the ET-64II will fit this lense. Hopefully it will fit.
EDIT: Tried the ET-64 as well - doesn't fit either. If you have a series I lense, you are stuck with a generic screw on 58mm lense-hood.
Customer Review: Doesn't fit my CANON 75-300 f/4.0-5.6
Summary: 1 Stars
I'm obviously quite disappointed since the hood doesn't fit my lens. Maybe it fits only the 75-300 USM ?? The package and all the descriptions seem erroneous...